The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro, securing the seventh position, exhibits a mixed performance profile. It excels in dry handling, showcasing effective braking on both snow and dry pavement, contributing to a comfortable driving experience. However, the tire displays a tendency to understeer on snow, which could affect maneuverability in winter conditions. Another significant drawback is its less than optimal hydroplaning resistance, both straight and lateral, which could impact safety and control during wet conditions.

The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro, ranked ninth, is deemed satisfactory, particularly excelling in wet and dry handling, as well as in braking on both wet and dry pavements. These strengths make it a competent choice for driving in wet and dry conditions. However, its performance on snow is less impressive, with weak lateral stability and a tendency to understeer. Additionally, the tire's level of comfort is not optimal, which might affect the overall driving experience. Despite these drawbacks, its solid performance on wet and dry surfaces remains a notable attribute.

The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro, positioned at 17th place and conditionally recommended, performs well in wet and dry handling and offers a comfortable ride. However, its limited tread life and high rolling resistance impact its overall economy and long-term value. Additionally, its resistance to lateral drift on wet surfaces is relatively poor, affecting its stability in such conditions.

The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro excels in dry and wet handling with excellent aquaplaning resistance, making it a strong contender in these areas. It also stands out for its quietness and comfort. However, its performance in the snow is limited, and it has the highest rolling resistance in the test, alongside longer wet braking distances.

The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro delivers commendable performance on both wet and dry terrains, characterized by impressive grip and adept handling. It particularly excels at absorbing impacts on uneven terrains. However, its capabilities are noticeably lacking on snowy surfaces, making it a less-than-ideal choice for a winter tire. Notably, it was docked a point for subpar handling in snowy conditions. The tires often respond with a delay to the driver's inputs, leading to a heightened risk of skidding.

• Negative: Its grip on snowy terrains is markedly poor for a winter tire, raising concerns about safety and reliability. The tire's performance could be improved in terms of resisting aquaplaning, especially in straight-line movements. Similarly, its resistance to lateral aquaplaning, especially during cornering, is a notable shortcoming. Braking capabilities on dry roads can be enhanced for quicker and safer stops. The tire might not be the most fuel-efficient option in the market. Drivers might experience noticeable noise, especially during turns, which might affect the comfort level of the ride.